LEAP District Mixed-Use Village · IEDC Initial Proposal · RFP deadline September 4, 2026 2:00 PM ET · Katie's internal target September 2

Joel Lilly Response Items

The eleven checklist items assigned to JL, with drafted responses where the data supports one and a marked ask where it does not. Working document — update and finalize before it goes back to Katie.

11
JL items
10
Drafted
0
Partial
1
Need input

What I need from you

One item remaining — everything else is drafted

Reviewed and streamlined 8/28, updated 4:20 PM ET against the RFP source document rather than the checklist summary. Asks that the drafted content already answers have been removed rather than left standing. What remains below cannot be closed from the records — it is carried as remaining rather than assigned.

  1. Item 72, financial capacity — the audited-statements approach, which entity signs as Proposer, whether Indiana counsel reviews the public-records treatment, and whether a proof-of-funds letter is achievable. For the group discussion Monday. This is the only pass/fail item in the set.

Done since this page was built

Closed 8/26–8/27

  1. Comparables are presented at the phase level. Joel's call 8/27 3:14 PM ET — a completed phase counts as a completed project for the RFP's "completed within the past ten (10) years" test, so the eligibility caveat that opened this page has been removed. Items 62, 64, 65, 66 and 76 all follow phase-level presentation.
  2. Your principal resume for the key-personnel section — revisions sent to Katie 8/26 5:11 PM, acknowledged 8/27 8:55 AM. Note the resumes and the 3-page member backgrounds sit INSIDE the 50-page limit.
  3. Your two professional references, sent to Katie 8/27 12:33 PM — Bill Kuhar (First Commonwealth) and Peter Schmitt (KeyBank). These also serve as the item 77 credit references. Worth noting your pick beat my suggestion: I had proposed Kuhar plus Michael Jacoby for the public-private angle, but Jacoby is counsel, not a credit relationship, so he would not have satisfied item 77 at all.

Comparable project cost — the spine of items 64, 65 and 76

Cost categoryQuarry TrailsGrandview CrossingJeffrey Park
Land$63.7M$29.8M$51.0M
Horizontal / site$45.2M$27.6M$40.3M
Vertical hard$232.5M$183.8M$243.3M
Soft$45.9M$50.3M$43.8M
Fees$10.5M$7.5M$8.5M
Total development cost$397.8M$299.0M$386.9M
Basis notes. Quarry Trails is stated at $397.8M — the operating entities plus all site and horizontal work wherever it sits, including the $33.8M carried in the Marble Cliff Canyon land-holding entity. The intercompany elimination is excluded. The five rows foot to $397.8M. Knoxville received $354.7M on 8/6 on a narrower basis that left the land-entity site work out; the former $422.6M gross basis double-counted $44.0M of intercompany and is not used here.

Jeffrey Park is now on a financing-budget basis — $386.9M. Built phase by phase from the budget used to finance each phase, with the final draw sheet (original bank budget column) where the financing package is missing. Covers all six apartment phases (1,071 units), the three for-sale phases (206 units), the community center plus the 2022 Collective remodel, both parking garages, and the JPNCA public infrastructure net of overlaps. Excluding The Celia, still under construction, it is $349.1M. This runs $87M above the $300M program figure previously used. Two soft spots: Foundry and Legacy carry no separate horizontal line, so their sitework sits inside vertical hard; and Homes at Jeffrey Park and Harris/Perry come from cost tie-outs rather than a financing budget. Before this column sits beside the other two, confirm whether Quarry Trails and Grandview Crossing include their own NCA-funded public infrastructure and garages — Jeffrey Park’s now does.

Grandview Crossing Phase 2 adds $226.4M planned, taking it to roughly $525M all in.

The eleven items

Item 41

Identify financial partners, prospective lenders and equity investors

Drafted

"Should identify" — scored under 5.2.2, including experience financing large-scale projects of similar size and scope.

Draft response

Across the three comparable communities Thrive currently carries $621.7M of outstanding institutional project debt with eighteen separate capital providers, and has raised $1.07B across all construction, bridge and permanent facilities to date.

Quarry Trails ($232.0M): Lument Structured Finance, SM Finance III, Simmons Bank (senior and mezzanine), Pathways, Kish Bank, Mutual Federal, Heartland Bank, Ohio State Bank, Riverside Bank.
Grandview Crossing ($287.6M): ACRES, SM Finance III, KeyBank, First Commonwealth Bank, Cuyahoga River Capital, Kish Bank.
Jeffrey Park ($192.2M): Wright-Patt Credit Union, LCNB, S&T Bank, Eagle Realty Group (a Western & Southern Financial Group company) on Legacy and Foundry, and First National Bank on The Sage.

The point to make is the depth of the bench, not any single relationship: no one lender carries more than roughly 10% of the portfolio, and the group spans balance-sheet banks, credit unions, debt funds and structured-finance shops.

Equity. Thrive is its own largest equity source. Across the three comparable communities Thrive has contributed $141.4M of equity — 20.0% of the $705.8M of sources across the thirteen phases with a financing package on file — in land, bond proceeds and cash, in first-loss position ahead of any bank funding (phase range 13.5% to 29.3%; Grandview Crossing, the closest analogue, 25.9%). Institutional equity is then placed project by project rather than out of a blind pool or a standing fund. Thrive's current capital stacks include institutional preferred equity from a national real estate investment manager at Quarry Trails, and a preferred equity commitment approved in June 2026 by an institutional investor on a fourth community now closing. For a project of the LEAP District's scale Thrive is in active discussion with institutional LP-equity sources and will select the equity partner once the development program, phasing and public-participation structure are fixed — equity is priced to a defined program, and committing it earlier misprices it. Every phase of all three comparable communities has been financed and delivered.

Item 64

Development costs by comparable project, split hard / soft / fees including horizontal

Drafted

"Should provide, at a minimum." Katie's note: horizontal cost is called out specifically, which matters given the unfunded utilities question on this site.

Draft response

Use the table above verbatim. The horizontal line is the one that answers IEDC's own concern, so lead with it rather than burying it: Thrive has delivered $113.1M of horizontal and site work across Quarry Trails, Grandview Crossing and Jeffrey Park — 11.4%, 9.2% and 10.4% of total project cost respectively — on three sites that each required full infrastructure before a single vertical dollar was spent.

Say delivered, not self-funded. Thrive did not write a cheque for $113.1M and should not claim to have. That work was funded by assembling land equity, community-authority bond proceeds, brownfield remediation grants and project debt into a single programme — which is a stronger answer for this RFP than a cheque would be. IEDC's stated problem is unfunded utility and infrastructure capacity; what they need is a partner who can structure horizontal funding from public and private sources, and that is demonstrably what Thrive has done three times.

Quarry Trails is the closer analogue: a former active quarry requiring brownfield remediation, new public roads, and utility extension, delivered alongside a 220-acre Metro Park.

Item 65

Development financing — debt, equity, sources, incentives and subsidies

Drafted

"Should provide, at a minimum." Katie's note: incentives and subsidies are named. Relevant to a publicly sponsored district.

Draft response — the three buckets (foots to the item 64 budget)

Sources for each community are stated in three buckets that add to its item 64 project budget. Debt is the construction and permanent financing that funded delivery, with every refinancing excluded so no facility is counted twice. Public bonds are at original par, counted once. Equity & reinvested proceeds, for all three communities, is Thrive’s contributed equity in land and cash plus the proceeds of for-sale closings and stabilised cash flow reinvested in later phases; it is the balancing figure to the budget.

Capital sourceQuarry TrailsGrandview CrossingJeffrey ParkTotal
Debt — construction and permanent financing that funded delivery$177.7M$210.9M$202.8M$591.3M
Public bonds — original par, 8 / 3 / 6 series$58.4M$23.1M$48.7M$130.2M
Equity & reinvested proceeds — land, cash and recycled for-sale closings$161.7M$65.0M$135.4M$362.2M
Equity & reinvested proceeds as share of budget40.7%21.7%35.0%33.4%
Total project budget (item 64)$397.8M$299.0M$386.9M$1,083.7M

Read this before using the equity line. It is the balancing figure, and it holds two different things: $141.4M of equity Thrive contributed ahead of any bank draw (documented phase by phase in Table A below) and the proceeds of for-sale closings and stabilised cash flow that were reinvested in later phases. Quarry Trails reads 40.7% and Jeffrey Park 35.0% because both carry large for-sale programs funded that way; Grandview Crossing, the closest analogue to the Village, is 21.7% and is almost all contributed equity. Debt excludes every refinancing so no facility is counted twice, and bond proceeds are counted once, in the bonds line, and never again inside equity. Jeffrey Park includes The Celia’s $37.9M budget and its $26.0M term-sheet loan because item 64 includes The Celia; excluding it the Jeffrey Park stack is $176.8M debt, $48.7M bonds, $123.6M equity on $349.1M.

Debt line, by entity — what is in it and what was left out
Entity / phaseBasisDebtSource
Quarry Trails — debt $177.7M
Tillmore (QT Apartments I)Construction loan at delivery$41.5MDraw 37 Owners tab; SM Finance III $51.0M refi (2/26/24) excluded as a refinancing
South Bank (QT Apartments II)Construction loan at delivery$49.9MDraw 32 Owners tab (Huntington); Lument $53.1M bridge (10/27/25) excluded
RockPointe (QT Apartments III)Balance drawn today (under construction)$38.5MNetSuite 2200: Simmons senior $28.71M + mezz $9.74M, 8/27/26; $73.36M facility
QT OfficeConstruction loan at delivery$7.7MDraw 23 Owners tab
QT Retail K/M/NLoan at delivery$5.3MNetSuite 2200 Mutual Federal $5.30M; matches draw-sheet implied
QT Homes (for-sale)Revolver balance today$17.6MNetSuite 2200 Pathways revolver + A&D, 9/1/26; cumulative draws $146.3M recycle through closings
QT TH & Flats (for-sale)Loan balance today$6.3MNetSuite 2200 Kish, 7/28/26 ($12.0M facility, paid down by unit releases)
Marble Cliff Canyon site entityLoan balances today$7.2MNetSuite 2200 Pathways $4.71M + Riverside $2.52M (site work / community center)
QT NorthLoan balances today$3.7MNetSuite 2200 Ohio State Bank $1.83M + Heartland revolver $1.91M
Refinancings excluded: SM Finance III $51.0M (Tillmore), Lument $53.1M (South Bank).
Grandview Crossing — debt $210.9M
The Thomas (810 GVX Apartments I)Construction loan at delivery$47.9MDraw 42 Owners tab; SM Finance III $61.2M refi (2/14/24) excluded
8 on the ParkConstruction loan at delivery$32.5MDraw 31 Owners tab; ACRES $72.0M portfolio refi (6/20/25) excluded
Midpoint West – Bldg IConstruction loan at delivery$14.3MDraw 26 Owners tab
Midpoint East – Bldg JConstruction loan at delivery$18.9MDraw 33 Owners tab
The Michael (GVX Apartments II)Balance drawn today (in lease-up)$53.7MNetSuite 2200 KeyBank, 8/24/26; $60.6M facility
BMW office building (810 Grandview Crossing Office)Construction-to-term loan in place$38.5MNetSuite 2200 First Commonwealth, 7/31/26
Grandview retail (GVX Retail I)Loan balance today$5.2MNetSuite 2200 Kish, 8/27/26
Excluded from debt as Phase 2 financing, not delivery financing of the built phases: First Commonwealth $20.0M land A&D (6/2/26), Cuyahoga River Capital RANs $7.94M drawn, Kish county-site A&D $1.38M. Phase 1 garage sits in the bonds bucket (OEBF 2021-2).
Jeffrey Park — debt $202.8M
Foundry (Jeffrey New Day Apartments)Construction loan at delivery (implied)$34.8M2016 draw sheet total sources less land equity; W&S perm $32.59M today
Legacy (Jeffrey Patriarch)Permanent loan in place$37.7MNetSuite 2200, 7/31/26 (Integrity Life / W&S, 2019); original construction loan not on file
Iron Works (Jeffrey Phase 5)Permanent loan in place$6.6MNetSuite 2200 (Fannie Mae DUS)
The Sage (Jeffrey Phase 8)Construction loan at delivery$45.0MDraw 34 Owners tab; Affinius $55.5M bridge excluded
The Patent (Jeffrey Phase 9)Construction loan at delivery$42.6MWright-Patt #10704132, guaranties 12/7/22; NetSuite balance $42.56M
Phases 6 & 7 (for-sale)Revolver balance today$3.9MNetSuite 2200 LCNB, 9/1/26
Jeffrey New Day LLC (master / NCA)Loan balance today$2.4MNetSuite 2200 S&T Bank, 8/29/26
Community centerLoan balance today$3.7MNetSuite 2200, 12/31/25
The Celia (Phase 10) — PLANNEDTerm sheet, not closed$26.0MFirst Financial term sheet 8/27/26 $26.0M; included only because item 64's $386.9M includes The Celia's $37.9M budget
Refinancing excluded: Affinius $55.5M (Sage). Garages and NCA infrastructure sit in the bonds bucket.
Supporting detail — Table A: capital structure at delivery, by phase (foots)

Each row is the sources block of the phase’s bank draw workbook, so every row foots and nothing is counted twice: bond proceeds that entered a stack appear once, in their own column, inside equity. Bank loan is the facility that funded delivery; later refinancings are excluded. This is the capital structure, phase by phase, for the 13 phases with a financing package on file.

PhaseLand equityBond proceedsCash equityThrive equityBank loan at deliveryOther sourcesTotal sources · equity %
Quarry Trails
Phase 1 – Tillmore (293 units)$8.5M——$8.5M$41.5M$5.2M$55.2M 15.4%
Phase 3 – South Bank (266 units)$8.6M$3.1M$0.5M$12.2M$49.9M$4.3M$66.4M 18.3%
QT Office (43,000 SF)$1.3M——$1.3M$7.7M$0.4M$9.4M 13.5%
QT Retail K/M/N (17,000 SF)$1.7M——$1.7M$5.3M—$7.0M 24.7%
QT Homes (for-sale, revolving)$28.7M—$1.2M$30.0M$146.3M—$176.3M 17.0%
Quarry Trails — 5 documented phases$48.9M$3.1M$1.7M$53.6M$250.7M$9.9M$314.2M 17.1%
Item 64 development cost $397.8M, all phases incl. site work and for-sale · documented phases cover 79% (indicative — financing budgets vs ledger cost) · not documented: TH & Flats for-sale (Heartland, then Kish), the community center ($5.7M facility), Marble Cliff Canyon site work (bond-funded), QT North
Grandview Crossing
Phase 1 – The Thomas (310 units)$9.3M—$8.1M$17.4M$47.9M—$65.2M 26.6%
8 on the Park (222 units)$4.9M$8.6M—$13.5M$32.5M—$46.0M 29.3%
Midpoint West – Bldg I (69 units)$1.5M$1.4M$2.5M$5.5M$14.3M—$19.7M 27.7%
Midpoint East – Bldg J (56 units)$2.7M$1.3M$3.0M$7.0M$18.9M—$25.9M 27.0%
Phase 3 – The Michael (282 units)——$17.5M$17.5M$60.6M—$78.1M 22.4%
Grandview Crossing — 5 documented phases$18.4M$11.3M$31.1M$60.8M$174.1M—$234.9M 25.9%
Item 64 development cost $299.0M, all phases incl. site work and for-sale · documented phases cover 79% (indicative — financing budgets vs ledger cost) · not documented: BMW of North America office building (First Commonwealth construction-to-term), 810 Grandview land and site entity, Phase 1 garage (bond-funded), Grandview retail
Jeffrey Park
Phase 1 – Foundry (276 units)$5.8M——$5.8M$34.8M—$40.6M 14.2%
Phase 8 – The Sage (310 units)$9.3M——$9.3M$45.0M$7.4M$61.7M 15.1%
Phase 9 – The Patent (177 units)$6.2M$5.6M$0.1M$11.9M$42.6M—$54.5M 21.8%
Jeffrey Park — 3 documented phases$21.2M$5.6M$0.1M$26.9M$122.4M$7.4M$156.7M 17.2%
Item 64 development cost $386.9M, all phases incl. site work and for-sale · documented phases cover 41% (indicative — financing budgets vs ledger cost) · not documented: Legacy, Iron Works, Phases 6 & 7 for-sale, both garages and the NCA public infrastructure (bond-funded), the community center; The Celia is excluded as under construction
All three communities — 13 phases$88.5M$20.0M$32.9M$141.4M$547.1M$17.3M$705.8M 20.0%

Across the thirteen documented phases Thrive contributed $141.4M of equity in land, bond proceeds and cash — 20.0% of $705.8M of sources, ahead of any bank draw, with a phase range of 13.5% to 29.3%. Grandview Crossing, the closest analogue to the Village, ran 25.9%.

Table B: public bonds — reference, not added to any total
CommunitySeriesOriginal parProceeds inside the stacks aboveIssuersWhat the bonds funded
Quarry Trails8$58.4M$3.1MMarble Cliff Quarry Community Authority; Columbus-Franklin County Finance Authority; port authority conduitSite work, public roads, utilities and the Metro Park interface carried in the Marble Cliff Canyon land entity; $3.06M entered the South Bank stack
Grandview Crossing3$23.1M$11.3MOhio Enterprise Bond Fund (Series 2021-2, $11.0M par); Columbus-Franklin County Finance AuthorityPhase 1 parking garage ($10.91M net proceeds); $11.29M entered the 8 on the Park, Midpoint West and Midpoint East stacks
Jeffrey Park6$48.7M$5.6MJeffrey Place New Community Authority; Ohio Enterprise Bond Fund (2022, Phase 9 garage); Columbus-Franklin County Finance AuthorityPublic infrastructure and both parking garages; $5.63M entered the Phase 9 stack as infrastructure
Total17$130.2M$20.0M

Bonds are obligations of the issuing authorities, repaid from community development charges and tax increment, not Thrive debt. Par is shown for the public-participation record only. The proceeds that entered a phase’s sources are already in Table A, once; the balance funded public infrastructure, site work and garages outside those stacks.

Table C: capacity to raise capital — a track record, allowed to exceed cost
Debt closed across all construction, bridge and permanent facilities, cumulative, refinancings included$1,067.2M
Institutional project debt outstanding today (intercompany land notes excluded)$621.7M
Separate capital providers across the three communities18
Public bond series · original par · issuing authorities17 · $130.2M · 5

Across the three communities Thrive has closed $1,067.2M of debt with 18 separate capital providers and placed $130.2M of public bonds across 17 series through 5 issuing authorities. These are cumulative originations over the life of each community and count each facility at commitment, refinancings included; they measure capacity to raise capital over time and are not a capital structure, so they are never set beside development cost.

Basis — read before publishing

Why the table changed (2 September). The previous table set cumulative debt, bond par and a rate-derived equity figure beside development cost, and any reader who footed it found sources $373.7M (34.5%) above cost — Katie flagged it in the margin, and IEDC would have too. Table A now foots by construction; Tables B and C carry the figures that legitimately exceed cost, on their own basis.

Equity is documented, not derived. $141.4M on $705.8M of sources across 13 phases = 20.0%, from the Owners tab of each phase’s draw workbook (Joel’s definition: land, bond proceeds and cash all count). The earlier “roughly $260M, 24%” applied a phase rate to full cost and is withdrawn. Two loans are implied from total sources less equity because the draw sheet has no bank-loan line (Foundry 2016, QT Retail); The Patent uses the documented Wright-Patt $42.56M. “Other sources” is what the Owners tab does not identify (deferred fees, reserves) and is not counted as equity. The Michael’s workbook shows $1.33M more uses than sources; the gap is excluded.

Coverage. Site work, garages, NCA infrastructure, for-sale programs other than QT Homes and the early Jeffrey Park phases have no financing package on file and are named under each community rather than estimated. Documented sources are therefore a floor. The share of item 64 cost is indicative only: financing budgets and ledger cost are different bases.

QT Homes is a for-sale program financed on a revolving A&D/construction line repaid from closings; its bank-loan figure is cumulative draws, not a balance, and is shown because it is how the phase was in fact funded.

Intercompany land notes are excluded ($90.2M gross, $82.7M eliminates in consolidation). Bonds are not Thrive debt. Table C’s $621.7M outstanding = $711.8M of ledger debt less $90.1M intercompany.

Tie-out workbook: LEAP Capital Structure at Delivery - 2026-09-02.xlsx in LEAP Working Docs.

Draft response — incentives and subsidies

Quarry Trails: Marble Cliff Quarry Community Authority (a new community authority levying a community development charge), Ohio brownfield remediation funding, port authority conduit financing, tax increment financing, and a land partnership with Columbus and Franklin County Metro Parks.

Grandview Crossing: Community Reinvestment Area abatement, tax increment financing, and an Ohio Transformational Mixed-Use Development tax credit award, delivered in partnership with the City of Grandview Heights.

Jeffrey Park: the Jeffrey Park New Community Authority, tax increment financing, and brownfield remediation on the former Jeffrey Manufacturing site.

The framing that matters for LEAP: every one of these was structured with a public partner, and in each case Thrive carried the development risk while the public tool funded infrastructure the project could not otherwise support.

Item 66

Project timeline — initial planning, land acquisition, construction completion

Drafted

Item 66 verbatim: "Project timeline, from initial planning to land acquisition to construction completion." Katie's note: three milestones, not one duration.

ProjectInitial planningLand acquisitionConstruction completion
Quarry TrailsOct 20, 2015
Marble Cliff Canyon LLC formed, Ohio SoS 201529403110
Feb 27, 2018 first closing
MCC share $5,759,030 — 79.59 ac development area + 251.81 ac mineral release · PSA effective 12/11/2015 · second closing later 2018, $5,374,044 · both closings $12,993,074
Ongoing
Tillmore 2021 · community center broke ground Jan 2022 · South Bank 2025 · RockPointe 486u through 2027
Grandview CrossingLate 2011
purchase contract negotiated ahead of the Jan 2012 closing · 810 Grandview LLC formed 1/12/2012, Ohio SoS 201201200081
Jan 18, 2012 first and principal closing, $800,000
WAF Properties LLC to 810 Grandview LLC · core ±38.78 ac assembled Jan 2012 – Oct 2013 for $815,000, 100% seller-financed, note not due until the Covenant Not to Sue issued · expanded 2016–18: 980 Dublin 1/20/16 $650,000, 1024 Dublin 3/9/16 $310,000, 1030 Dublin 5/1/17 $625,000, Norfolk Southern 3.4 ac 12/18/18 $682,600
Ongoing
remediation-led: quarry 1920s–40s, construction and industrial landfill until it closed 1967, $3.0M CORF grant 2013 · The Michael 282u in lease-up 2026 · Phase 2 in planning
Jeffrey ParkJune 14, 2011
Note Purchase Agreement, Pramco IV to Wagenbrenner Development — assigned to Jeffrey New Day LLC 9/12/2011 for $1,450,000. Thrive's actual entry.
Oct 31, 2011
Abbott Laboratories to Jeffrey New Day LLC · $2,100,000
Ongoing
Foundry early 2016 · The Patent 2024 · The Celia under construction
Build-out timeline — vertical construction start to first occupancy

Each bar runs from vertical construction start to first tenant occupancy. Orange dots mark delivery of individual buildings inside a phase. Hatched bars are still under construction. Starts are building permits or construction loan closings; occupancy dates are first resident move-ins from Entrata, so a bar ends when the building actually came online rather than when paperwork cleared. Source file: LEAP Project Timelines - 2026-08-27 v5.csv in the LEAP Working Docs folder. Program figures under each project heading: unit counts and residential SF from the Entrata box_score report; garage SF and space counts from the certificates of occupancy; acreage and the Quarry Trails commercial split are Joel's figures. These are delivered and under-construction figures. They are deliberately smaller than the at-buildout numbers in the 3/9/2026 bond deck and the Knoxville RFQ — those count the full programme, this counts what is standing. Do not mix the two bases in one sentence. Published figures, reconciled 8/28. Jeffrey Park's "1,400+" counts for-sale units alongside the rentals and may also pick up a couple of projects built by others; Thrive's own delivered and under-construction total at Jeffrey Park is 1,277 units — 1,071 rental plus 206 for-sale, and that is the figure to use. Jeffrey Park acreage is stated as 41 acres here to match the bond deck and the Knoxville RFQ. The Quarry Trails metro park stays at 220 acres. The Grandview park is privately owned by 810 Grandview, LLC but open to the public, so describe it that way rather than as a public park. The Grandview 140-key hotel is neither built nor under construction and is excluded from every delivered figure on this page.

Grandview CrossingJeffrey ParkQuarry Trailsbuilding deliveredunder construction
201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025202620272028
Grandview Crossing
939 rental units698,266 SF residential60 acres125,000 SF office (BMW)677 structured spaces / 225,041 SF garage~67,000 SF retail delivered
Phase 1 - The Thomas (P, Z)
Jun 2020 – Jul 2023
Midpoint West - Bldg I (721 GVX Way)
Sep 2021 – Mar 2024
8 on the Park - R1 to R8 (Olivine Dr)
Nov 2021 – Jun 2024
Phase 1 - Parking Garage
Nov 2021 – Aug 2023
Midpoint East - Bldg J (710 GVX Way)
May 2022 – Sep 2024
The Michael - Bldgs Q & ZZ
Feb 2025 – Jul 2026
Full program
Jun 2020 – Jul 2026
Jeffrey Park
1,071 rental units206 for-sale units776,117 SF residential41 acres865 structured spaces / 187,000 SF garage
Phase 1 - Foundry (276 units)
Feb 2014 – May 2015
Phase 2 - Office & Community Center
Sep 2014 – Dec 2015
Phase 4 - Legacy (266 units)
Oct 2016 – May 2018
Phase 5 - Iron Works (42 units)
Oct 2018 – Sep 2019
Phase 8 - The Sage (680 Civitas)
Sep 2020 – Jun 2023
Phase 6 - Harris Flats HB2 (705 Civitas)
Jan 2021 – Oct 2022
Phase 6 - Harris Flats HB3 (695 Civitas)
May 2021 – Apr 2023
Phase 7 - Perry Townhomes PB2 (290-302 Dickenson)
Jul 2021 – Aug 2023
Phase 9 - Garage (279 Dickenson)
Dec 2021 – Oct 2024
Phase 7 - Perry Townhomes PB3 (274-286 Dickenson)
Apr 2022 – Sep 2023
Bada / community commercial (233 E 1st)
Jun 2022 – Dec 2022
Phase 6 - Harris Flats HB4 (270 Dickenson)
Aug 2022 – Jan 2024
Phase 9 - Apartments (299 Dickenson)
Sep 2022 – Jan 2025
Phase 6 - Harris Flats HB5 (260 Dickenson)
Mar 2025 – Jul 2026
Full program
Feb 2014 – Jul 2026
Quarry Trails
1,045 rental units delivered or under construction (768 in service today)276 for-sale units (100 TH/flat, 176 detached)728,460 SF residential85 acres18,000 SF retail43,000 SF office5,000 SF community centerno structured parking
Phase 1 Apartments (F1-F7, J1, J2)
Sep 2020 – Mar 2024
Phase 1 Townhomes & Flats (HB1, HB2, PB1, PB2)
Sep 2020 – Nov 2024
QT Office (2130 QT Dr)
Jan 2021 – Jun 2022
Phase 2 Townhomes & Flats (HB3-HB6)
Jun 2022 – Feb 2026
Community Center (2112 QT Dr)
Sep 2022 – Jun 2023
Phase 2 Apartments (Bldg Q, P1-P2)
Nov 2022 – Sep 2025
Retail Bldgs K, M, N (core + TI)
Jan 2023 – Sep 2023
Phase 2 Detached Homes
Nov 2023 – Sep 2025
Phase 3 Apartments - Rockpointe (A-H + CC)
May 2025 – Jun 2027
Phase 4 Detached Homes
Sep 2025 – Dec 2027
Full program
Sep 2020 – Dec 2027
Verification status. Every figure in the table is quoted from a primary document I have read — Ohio Secretary of State formation certificates, the executed Quarry Trails PSA and closing reconciliation, the Grandview settlement statements and the 1/22/2015 Crown appraisal, and the Jeffrey Park Note Purchase Agreement and Abbott closing statement.


Dates we do not state: a Grandview mass-grading date, a Grandview vertical-loan closing date, an August 2011 contract date, and any Quarry Trails construction start. No document supports them, so they stay out.
Accuracy notes — these stop a wrong claim going in
  • Do not claim 2001–2007 as Thrive's planning on Jeffrey Park. The City's executed June 2014 MOU says it in as many words: redevelopment "began in 2001"; "in 2006, the CITY entered into an agreement with National Community Builders, Inc."; "NCB defaulted on the private construction agreement … therefore, the improvements are incomplete"; and "JEFFREY has acquired and intends to continue" the work. The 2001–2006 effort was another sponsor's and it failed. Thrive's start is June 2011. If you want the site's full arc, label it the site's history, not our tenure — and note the JPNCA 2006A bonds predate us.
  • Knoxville's "under construction 2020 – present" understates Grandview Crossing. The land was assembled from January 2012. If LEAP sees a 2012 land buy and a 2020 construction start they will ask what happened in between, and the answer is a good one: a closed construction and industrial landfill, a $3.0M CORF remediation grant in 2013, and seller financing structured so the note was not due until the Covenant Not to Sue issued. Better said than left to guess.
  • One internal conflict where the documents win. Your 11/12/2020 note to Union Bank says the Grandview land was acquired in 2011. The closing is 1/18/2012 and 810 Grandview LLC did not exist until 1/12/2012, so 2011 was the contract. Separately, Chad Kiner's 12/12/2019 list dates 1030 Dublin Rd to Aug 2018 while the settlement statement reads 5/1/2017 at the same $625,000.
  • Neighborhood name. The City's own executed MOU places the Jeffrey site in Victorian Village; our materials, including Knoxville, say Italian Village. Italian Village is the conventional designation and almost certainly the right one — just be aware the City document says otherwise if anyone diffs them.
Item 71

Phasing financials — key decisions, sell/buy points, average home prices

Drafted

"Should provide, at a minimum." Katie's note: average home prices apply to the for-sale components specifically.

Draft response — average home prices (confirmed, Quarry Trails)

Townhomes and flats: 47 of 100 units closed for $28.9M, averaging $615,100 and $412 per square foot. Pricing has moved from $399 to $436 per foot on flats and $384 to $403 on townhomes between 2022 and 2026.

Single family: 61 of 176 homes closed, lifetime average $971,773 at $328 per foot; the 2026 vintage averages $1,059,120 at $370 per foot.

2026 is the record year for the for-sale program at 14 condominium closings, 3.5 times the 2025 total — a useful data point on absorption in a phased build-out.

Draft response — key decisions and phasing approach

Thrive's phasing approach is consistent across all three communities and is built on two convictions.

Lead with multiple phases at once to manufacture critical mass. The first several phases are launched simultaneously or on a slight stagger rather than sequentially. A single opening phase in a greenfield district has no context to sell against; several opening together create the density, activity and visible momentum that make the place legible to a resident deciding whether to move there. Subsequent phases then follow the market rather than a fixed schedule, released so that there is always product available but never so much that demand is satisfied. That is the sell/buy discipline: supply is deliberately kept slightly behind demand, which protects pricing and absorption in every later phase.

Amenities and commercial are delivered with the residential, not after it. Neither works without the other. Residential absorption depends on the amenity and commercial fabric being there on day one, and the commercial cannot survive without resident density to support it. At Jeffrey Park that meant the community center, pools, fitness and central park were built into the early phases and the final phase inherits a complete amenity base. At Quarry Trails the community center and retail were delivered alongside the first apartment and for-sale phases. Grandview Crossing followed the same sequence with its garage, retail and public realm.

The evidence is in the delivery record: three communities carried from raw or remediated land through ten, four and three phases respectively, with 95.1% leased across the Jeffrey Park portfolio and a record for-sale year in 2026 at Quarry Trails — fourteen condominium closings, three and a half times the 2025 total.

Item 72

Demonstrate the financial capacity to finance and develop the Project

Need input

Pass/Fail under 5.2.1. Katie flags the tension: the lead-in says Proposers "may provide," the first bullet says the Proposer "shall submit." Treat as required.

Draft framing

The honest position is that Thrive does not own the assets, so operating-company audited statements understate capacity. The stronger evidence is the delivered portfolio: more than $1.1 billion of development delivered or under way across five communities, currently supported by $621.7M of outstanding institutional project debt across eighteen capital providers in the three comparable communities alone, every dollar of it raised project by project.

The audited-statements problem, and how the RFP text handles it

Thrive does not obtain CPA audits. That is a real gap against a bullet that says "shall submit," so it has to be answered deliberately rather than left blank. Three things in Section 5.2.6 as actually written give us room.

1. The obligation is to demonstrate capacity; the list is permissive. The section's binding sentence is "Proposers shall demonstrate their financial capacity to finance and develop the Project." The enumerated bullets are introduced by "To demonstrate this, Proposers may provide the following." The "shall submit" inside the first bullet sits underneath that "may provide" lead-in, so the requirement is the outcome, not the specific document.

2. The RFP anticipates the confidentiality concern and supplies the mechanism. Verbatim: "The respondent is encouraged to mark financial information ‘Proprietary and confidential’ on each applicable page of the submission." So the financials belong in a separate, severable exhibit, marked on every page — which is how Katie has already structured it in the proposal outline as a Confidential Financial Capacity exhibit. Be clear-eyed though: IEDC is an Indiana public body, and marking a page is the mechanism the RFP offers, not an absolute shield under Indiana's public records act. That is a question for Indiana counsel before anything is filed.

3. The contingent-liability schedule is the substance behind the requirement, and we can produce it. What a scorer is really testing is whether the Proposer's obligations are disclosed. Providing that schedule, audited or not, answers the underlying question.

Recommended handling, three parts: answer the section's real obligation with the strongest evidence we have — $1.07B of debt raised across eighteen capital providers, $141.4M of documented sponsor equity — 20.0% of sources across the thirteen phases with a financing package on file, $130.2M of bonds across seventeen series, and two credit references both carrying live exposure. Then address the audit bullet head-on in one short paragraph: state plainly that Thrive is privately held and does not obtain CPA audits, state what is provided instead, and offer audited or CPA-reviewed statements at Final Proposal stage under a non-disclosure agreement if shortlisted. Offering that escalation is what stops a scorer treating this as a fail. Silent omission is the one approach that does fail.

Which entity is "the Proposer" is also a choice we control and it changes what the statements look like. Worth settling before anything is drafted, noting that 5.2.8 asks about the firm, the development team and the parent company, so IEDC will look through the structure regardless.

Remaining — for the group discussion Monday:
  • Sign off on the approach above, and decide which entity signs as Proposer.
  • Whether Indiana counsel should confirm the public-records treatment before financials are filed.
  • Whether a proof-of-funds or equity commitment letter is achievable before September 4.
Item 75

Evidence of capability to raise debt and equity in the current market

Drafted

Shall / may provide. Katie's note: current market conditions, not historical capability. A lender or equity letter is the most direct evidence.

Draft response

Point at closings inside the last twelve months rather than the portfolio as a whole. Candidates from the ledger: the Simmons Bank senior and mezzanine facilities on Quarry Trails Phase III, the Kish Bank facility on the Quarry Trails townhomes and flats with a second-phase term sheet executed in August 2026, and the WestBend construction package now closing.

The three closings named above all fall inside the last twelve months, which is what this item is scored on. A current lender letter would strengthen it further but is not required to answer.

Item 76

Evidence of experience financing recent comparable transactions

Drafted

Shall / may provide. Katie's note: overlaps with the comparable-project financing fields in 5.2.5 — cross-reference rather than duplicating pages, since page limits are tight.

Draft response

Do not re-state the numbers here. Cross-reference item 65 and add one line: the three comparable communities were financed across eighteen capital providers spanning construction, bridge, permanent, mezzanine and seller paper, alongside four separate public credit-enhancement structures — new community authorities, tax increment financing, port authority conduit issuance and state tax credits.

Watch the page budget. Only the cover page, table of contents, dividers, Financial Capacity and Execution of Offer sit outside the 50-page limit. Key personnel resumes and the three-page-per-member backgrounds do not.
Item 77

Two commercial or institutional credit references, with addresses

Drafted

Shall / may provide. Katie's note: addresses are required, not just names and contacts.

Selected 8/27

Chosen by you and already sent to Katie at 12:33 PM on 8/27 — both are institutional credit relationships, which is what this item asks for:

William (Bill) Kuhar, Senior Vice President, CRE, First Commonwealth Bank — WKuhar@fcbanking.com, 330-242-0153. Lender on Grandview Crossing, currently $58.5M across two facilities.
Address: First Commonwealth Bank, 654 Philadelphia Street, Indiana, PA 15701.
Peter Schmitt, Senior Vice President, Senior Banker, Income Property Group, KeyBank — peter_schmitt@keybank.com, 614-460-3490, mobile 614-961-0962.
Address: KeyBank, 88 East Broad Street, 2nd Floor, Columbus, OH 43215.

Both carry live exposure, so each can speak to current credit standing rather than a historical relationship.

Addresses verified 8/28. First Commonwealth's main office moved to 654 Philadelphia Street on 30 September 2024 — the widely listed 601 Philadelphia Street is the old address, so use 654. KeyBank's 88 East Broad Street, 2nd Floor is a real KeyBank commercial location, which means Schmitt's own signature block was right. The 259 W. Schrock Road address previously on file for Kuhar was wrong and has been removed — it matches no First Commonwealth location.

One practical note for item 78: Kuhar sits in Ohio, so a letter addressed to the Pennsylvania corporate office reaches the bank rather than his desk. That satisfies the RFP's address requirement, but if you want the authorization letter in his hands, send him a copy by email as well.

Item 78

Authorization letter permitting each credit reference to respond to IEDC

Drafted

Shall / may provide. Katie's note: a separate deliverable from the reference itself, and the item most commonly missed. One letter per reference.

Delivered 8/28

Both letters are written, signed and filed. One to Kuhar at First Commonwealth, one to Schmitt at KeyBank, each on Thrive letterhead over Joel's signature, dated 2 September 2026.

The RFP settles the format: §5.2.6 asks for "a letter authorizing each credit reference to respond to inquiries from IEDC and its agents and representatives" — so two letters, one per reference, and the letters use that phrasing deliberately, since JLL is running the process for IEDC and is the party likely to call. Each letter authorises the bank to speak to payment history, facility structures and amounts, outstanding balances and general credit standing, written and oral, and states that no further authorisation is required.

DOCX and PDF are in Egnyte at Projects > !Pipeline > LEAP District Mixed-Use Village > RFP & Submittal > LEAP Working Docs, alongside Katie's files.

The letters carry an applied image of Joel's signature rather than a wet signature. Normal practice for an RFP authorisation letter, but if IEDC or either bank wants an auditable execution, route them through DocuSign and treat these as the drafts.

One correction worth carrying forward

The NetSuite cost query we have been reusing computes SUM of debits minus SUM of credits, which returns null for any account that only ever carries debits. At whole-entity level it nets out correctly, which is why the totals given to Knoxville stand unchanged. At account level it silently drops entire accounts — the first pass of the table above had Quarry Trails vertical hard at $184M against a true $232.5M. Corrected and re-run. Anything built off that recipe below entity level should be re-checked.